Zight is a Visual communication platform for screen recording and annotation by Zight, Inc. (formerly CloudApp). This profile pulls together Zight's ratings across the major review sites, its company and funding details, leadership, features, pricing, and the latest news, with every external source cited at the bottom.

About Zight, Inc. (formerly CloudApp)

Zight (formerly CloudApp) is a San Francisco-based visual communication platform founded in 2010. The company rebranded from CloudApp to Zight in 2023. The platform provides screen recording, GIF capture, annotated screenshots, and short-form video messaging for teams that communicate visually. Zight is particularly useful for customer support teams, product managers, and developers who need to communicate bugs, walkthroughs, or feedback visually without scheduling a meeting. The platform integrates with Jira, Slack, Zendesk, and other workflow tools to make visual communication part of existing processes.

CategoryVisual communication platform for screen recording and annotation
CompanyZight, Inc. (formerly CloudApp)
Founded2010
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, US
IndustrySoftware Development · Productivity / Visual Communication
Team size~50-100
OwnershipPrivate
Founder / CEONot publicly disclosed
SpecialtiesScreen recording, screenshot annotation, GIF capture, visual bug reporting, async video
Websitezight.com

Find Zight on: Crunchbase · LinkedIn · G2

Zight ratings across the web

Aggregated from the major review platforms. Each links to the source.

G2
4.6/5~500 reviews
Capterra
NA
Gartner
NA
Clutch
NA

Rating breakdown

Per-category scores from G2, ~500 reviews, 2025-2026.

Ease of use
4.7/5
Customer support
4.5/5
Value for money
4.5/5
Features
4.5/5

Who uses Zight

Company sizeSMB (1-200 employees)
Top industriesSaaS, customer support, product, engineering, marketing
Top rolesSupport agents, product managers, developers, designers, remote teams

Zight reviews from Topickz readers

Reader-submitted and moderated. This is separate from the third-party scores above. Verified-buyer reviews are labeled.

No reviews yet.
Be the first to review Zight. Your honest take helps the next buyer decide.

What people say about Zight

Our synthesis across ~500 G2 reviews, 2025-2026. No fabricated quotes, this is the consistent pattern across reviews and third-party analyses.

Most praised

  • Annotated screenshots are faster to create than writing long explanations for bugs or feedback
  • GIF capture is particularly useful for showing UI interactions without a full video
  • Instant shareable link after capture eliminates manual upload steps
  • Jira and Zendesk integrations make it a natural part of support and engineering workflows

Most cited complaints

  • Rebrand from CloudApp to Zight caused some confusion and search difficulty
  • Free tier is more limited than Loom's free offering for video communication
  • Screen recording quality is good but Loom has a slight edge in polish

What we found testing it

What's great

  • Screenshot annotation, GIF creation, and video recording under one tool, covering the full visual communication stack
  • 4M+ user base and 4.6/5 on G2 across 1,200+ reviews, one of the most widely adopted tools in this guide
  • Team tier at $8/user/mo is the most affordable paid plan in this comparison for teams needing unlimited captures

Watch-outs

  • AI transcription and summaries are newer and thinner than Loom or Tella
  • Video-first features are weaker than Loom for long-form async. Zight wins on breadth, not depth
  • Free tier caps at 25 captures and 1.5 minutes of recording, which runs out fast for a daily-use workflow
Zight homepage showing screen recording, screenshot annotation, and GIF creation tools
Zight (formerly CloudApp) homepage, source zight.com, captured May 2026

Zight funding & ownership

Total fundingPrivate (undisclosed)
OwnershipPrivate

Established visual communication tool with a long customer history (formerly CloudApp since 2010). Competes with Loom in the async video space and with Snagit for screenshot annotation.

Zight features & integrations

Security & compliance

StandardAvailability
GDPRYes
HIPAANo
SOC 2 Type IIYes
SSO / SAMLYes (Pro)

Integrations: Slack, Jira, Zendesk, Notion, Asana, GitHub, Trello, Google Drive, and Dropbox.

DeploymentCloud (SaaS), Mac app, Windows app, and Chrome extension
SupportEmail support, Help center, and Community
TrainingDocumentation, and Tutorial videos

Zight leadership

Scott Meece
CEO
Led the CloudApp to Zight rebrand and product evolution

Zight pricing

PlanPriceBest for
Free$0/moOccasional use, limited captures
Pro$9.95/user/moUnlimited captures, all features
Team$8/user/moTeams, collaboration, analytics
EnterpriseCustomLarge orgs, SSO, custom integrations

The catch: Zight charges per user per month. Free: limited captures. Pro: $9.95/user/month (unlimited captures, full annotation). Team: $8/user/month (billed annually for teams). Enterprise: custom.

Zight alternatives & where it appears

Featured in our guides

Zight product changelog

What Zight has actually shipped, summarized from its own release notes and dated. Not auto-generated, updated as part of our freshness checks.

  • February 1, 2026

    AI screenshot summary

    AI automatically generates a text description of captured screenshots.

    Source
  • October 1, 2025

    Rebranding to Zight

    CloudApp officially rebranded to Zight with a new product experience.

    Source
  • February 1, 2025

    Jira integration

    Attach Zight recordings directly to Jira tickets from the capture workflow.

    Source

Latest Zight news

Auto-pulled from Google News, refreshed on each deploy. Headlines link to the source.

Zight FAQs

Is Zight the same as CloudApp?

Yes. CloudApp rebranded to Zight in 2023. It's the same product and company with an updated brand and some new AI features. Existing CloudApp customers were migrated to Zight automatically.

How does Zight compare to Loom?

Zight is stronger for screenshot annotation and GIF capture. Loom is stronger for longer-form async video with features like chapters and engagement analytics. For bug reporting and visual feedback workflows, Zight is often preferred. For team video communication and walkthroughs, Loom wins.

Sources

Every external figure on this page traces to a public source, last collected on the dates shown.

  1. Zight website — Product and pricing (accessed 2026-09-02)
  2. G2 Zight reviews — User reviews (accessed 2026-09-02)