Neat is a Small business accounting / expense management by The Neat Company. This profile pulls together Neat's ratings across the major review sites, its company and funding details, leadership, features, pricing, and the latest news, with every external source cited at the bottom.

About The Neat Company

Neat (formerly The Neat Company) is a Philadelphia-based software company that started as a document scanning and organization solution and evolved into a small business accounting and expense management platform.

Founded in 2002, Neat pivoted from hardware scanners to a cloud-based platform that handles receipt capture, expense categorization, invoicing, and basic bookkeeping. The platform uses AI-powered OCR to extract data from receipts and business documents.

Neat targets self-employed professionals, freelancers, and very small businesses that need simple expense tracking integrated with basic accounting.

The company has been through multiple product pivots and now positions primarily as an expense management and bookkeeping tool.

CategorySmall business accounting / expense management
CompanyThe Neat Company
Founded2002
HeadquartersCharlotte, North Carolina, US
IndustryFinancial Technology · Expense Management / Accounting
Team size~50-100
OwnershipPrivate
Founder / CEOMultiple founders through ownership changes
SpecialtiesExpense tracking, receipt scanning, small business accounting, document management
Websiteneat.com

Find Neat on: Crunchbase · LinkedIn · G2 · Capterra

Neat ratings across the web

Aggregated from the major review platforms. Each links to the source.

G2
4.4/5~200 reviews
Capterra
4.4/5~150 reviews
Gartner
NA
Clutch
NA

Rating breakdown

Per-category scores from G2 and Capterra, ~350 reviews, 2025-2026.

Ease of use
4.5/5
Customer support
4.2/5
Value for money
4.3/5
Features
4.2/5

Who uses Neat

Company sizeFreelancers, sole proprietors, businesses with <10 employees
Top industriesProfessional services, creative, contractors, small retail
Top rolesBusiness owners, freelancers, self-employed

Neat reviews from Topickz readers

Reader-submitted and moderated. This is separate from the third-party scores above. Verified-buyer reviews are labeled.

No reviews yet.
Be the first to review Neat. Your honest take helps the next buyer decide.

What people say about Neat

Our synthesis across ~350 G2 and Capterra reviews, 2025-2026. No fabricated quotes, this is the consistent pattern across reviews and third-party analyses.

Most praised

  • Easy receipt capture and automatic categorization
  • Good for organizing business expenses without an accountant
  • Long-standing product reliability

Most cited complaints

  • Feature set lags behind Expensify and newer competitors
  • UI feels somewhat dated
  • Limited integrations outside QuickBooks

What we found testing it

What's great

  • OCR receipt capture turns a shoebox of paper receipts into searchable, categorized digital records with almost no manual entry
  • Cloud storage with mobile access means a contractor or field-service owner can log an expense on-site rather than at month-end
  • Annual pricing at $200/yr is cheaper on a monthly basis than most tools on this list once you skip the add-ons

Watch-outs

  • Only 11 G2 reviews as of mid-2026, one of the thinnest evidence bases on this list
  • VIP Service and Automated Insights are separate paid add-ons at $50/yr and $150/yr, which erodes the headline price fast
  • It's a documentation and expense-capture tool first, general ledger and invoicing depth is secondary to QuickBooks or Xero
Neat receipt capture and bookkeeping app homepage showing organized expense document scanning
Neat homepage, source neat.com, captured July 2026

Neat funding & ownership

Total fundingUndisclosed (multiple private rounds over 20 years)
OwnershipPrivate
RoundAmountDateLead investor
Various private roundsUndisclosed2002-presentVarious
Long operating history (20+ years) is a signal of sustainability. Product has pivoted several times. Smaller market presence vs. Expensify or Ramp. Suitable for very small businesses needing simple expense tracking.

Neat features & integrations

Feature availability

FeatureStatus
Free tierno
Invoicing• basic
Mobile appYes
Multi currencyNo
Receipt capture✓ OCR core feature

Security & compliance

StandardAvailability
GDPRYes
HIPAAN/A
SOC 2 Type IIYes
SSO / SAMLNo

Integrations: QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Excel/CSV export, and Bank import.

DeploymentCloud (web-based), and iOS and Android mobile apps
SupportEmail support, Phone support, Help center, and Chat support
TrainingVideo tutorials, and Help center documentation

Neat leadership

Executive team
Details not widely publicized

Neat pricing

PlanPriceBest for
Neat$24/moSelf-employed and freelancers, basic expense tracking
Neat+$48/moSmall teams with invoicing and advanced reporting
The catch: Neat charges $24-$48/month depending on plan and features. Annual billing provides discounts. Suitable for businesses spending under $1,000/year on accounting software.

Neat alternatives & where it appears

Featured in our guides

Neat product changelog

What Neat has actually shipped, summarized from its own release notes and dated. Not auto-generated, updated as part of our freshness checks.

  • January 1, 2025

    AI receipt extraction improvements

    Improved OCR accuracy for receipts and invoices.

    Source

Latest Neat news

Auto-pulled from Google News, refreshed on each deploy. Headlines link to the source.

Neat FAQs

Does Neat replace QuickBooks?
No. Neat is simpler and better for expense capture and receipt organization. For full accounting with payroll and complex reporting, QuickBooks or Xero is needed.
Is Neat the same as the old Neat Scanner software?
Yes and no. The Neat Company originally sold physical document scanners and software. They pivoted to a cloud-only model and now focus on cloud-based expense management.

Sources

Every external figure on this page traces to a public source, last collected on the dates shown.

  1. Neat website — Product and pricing (accessed 2026-09-02)
  2. G2 Neat reviews — User reviews (accessed 2026-09-02)