Make is a No-code automation and integration platform by Celonis SE (Make subsidiary). This profile pulls together Make's ratings across the major review sites, its company and funding details, leadership, features, pricing, and the latest news, with every external source cited at the bottom.
About Celonis SE (Make subsidiary)
Make (formerly Integromat) is a Prague-based no-code automation platform originally founded in 2012 by Ondřej Gazda. Integromat was acquired by Celonis in 2020 for an undisclosed amount and rebranded to Make in 2022.
The platform provides a visual, canvas-based workflow builder with more advanced data transformation capabilities than Zapier, including branching logic, iterators, aggregators, and complex HTTP request handling.
Make is particularly popular with technical operators, digital agencies, and power users who need automation complexity beyond what Zapier offers. The platform has over 400,000 users and 1,500+ app integrations.
| Category | No-code automation and integration platform |
| Company | Celonis SE (Make subsidiary) |
| Founded | 2012 (as Integromat) |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Industry | Software Development · Automation / Integration |
| Team size | ~200-400 |
| Ownership | Subsidiary of Celonis SE |
| Founder / CEO | Ondřej Gazda |
| Specialties | No-code automation, visual workflow builder, API integrations, data transformation |
| Website | make.com |
Find Make on: Crunchbase · LinkedIn · G2 · Capterra
Make ratings across the web
Aggregated from the major review platforms. Each links to the source.
Rating breakdown
Per-category scores from G2 and Capterra, ~1,200 reviews, 2025-2026.
Who uses Make
Make reviews from Topickz readers
Reader-submitted and moderated. This is separate from the third-party scores above. Verified-buyer reviews are labeled.
Be the first to review Make. Your honest take helps the next buyer decide.
Review Make
Your honest take, in about two minutes. We verify each review before it publishes.
What people say about Make
Our synthesis across ~1,200 G2 and Capterra reviews, 2025-2026. No fabricated quotes, this is the consistent pattern across reviews and third-party analyses.
Most praised
- Visual canvas makes it possible to build automation flows that would be impossible in Zapier
- Data transformation capabilities (mapping, aggregation, iteration) far exceed Zapier
- Price per operation is 5-10x cheaper than Zapier for equivalent automation volume
- Error handling and retry logic built into workflows
Most cited complaints
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier for non-technical users
- Some app integrations are community-maintained with inconsistent quality
- Support response times can be slow on free/Core plans
What we found testing it
What's great
- Visual scenario builder makes complex branching, error-routing, and parallel paths readable at a glance; easier to review and debug than Zapier's linear step view
- Operations pricing (only active steps counted) means 5-10x cheaper than Zapier at the same workflow volume
- 1,000 free operations per month with unlimited active scenarios; the free tier is genuinely usable for low-volume ops work
Watch-outs
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier; first-time builders usually need 3-5 hours to grok the scenario model and data-mapping syntax
- App library trails Zapier's 9,000+; some long-tail SaaS integrations require custom HTTP modules or aren't available at all
- Support response times slow down on free and lower-paid tiers; enterprise support requires the Company plan (custom pricing)
Make funding & ownership
| Round | Amount | Date | Lead investor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition by Celonis | Undisclosed | 2020 | Celonis SE |
Make features & integrations
Security & compliance
| Standard | Availability |
|---|---|
| GDPR | Yes (EU company) |
| HIPAA | No |
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes (Type II) |
| SSO / SAML | Yes (Enterprise) |
Integrations: Slack, Airtable, Google Workspace, Shopify, HubSpot, Salesforce, GitHub, Jira, Stripe, Twilio, OpenAI, Anthropic, and 1,500+ others.
Make leadership
Make pricing
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/mo | Testing and simple automations, 1K ops |
| Core | $10.59/mo | Small teams, 10K operations/month |
| Pro | $18.82/mo | Power users, custom variables, advanced tools |
| Teams | $34.12/mo | Team collaboration, 10K+ ops |
| Enterprise | Custom | High volume, SSO, dedicated support |
The catch: Make charges per operation (one step in an automation = one operation). Free: 1,000 ops/month. Core: $10.59/month (10K ops). Pro: $18.82/month (10K ops + advanced features). Teams: $34.12/month.
Operations pricing scales; complex workflows consume more ops than simple ones.
Make alternatives & where it appears
Head-to-head comparisons
Featured in our guides
Make product changelog
What Make has actually shipped, summarized from its own release notes and dated. Not auto-generated, updated as part of our freshness checks.
- February 1, 2026
- October 1, 2025
- February 1, 2025
Latest Make news
Auto-pulled from Google News, refreshed on each deploy. Headlines link to the source.
- How Cloud integrated agentic workflows - Think with Google - Google Business ProfileThu, 08 Oct 2026
- n8n vs Make: Which automation platform should you choose? - HostingerFri, 18 Sep 2026
- Make.com vs. n8n: Features, Pricing & Which One to Choose in 2026 - GoodcallFri, 26 Jun 2026
- Barndoor Acquires Diaphora to Scale Governed AI Workflow Automation - citybizWed, 16 Sep 2026
- Automate business processes with agents plus workflows in Microsoft Copilot Studio - MicrosoftFri, 10 Apr 2026
- SAP backs n8n as enterprise AI shifts toward workflow automation - Startup FortuneTue, 12 May 2026
Make FAQs
Is Make better than Zapier?
What is an 'operation' in Make?
Sources
Every external figure on this page traces to a public source, last collected on the dates shown.
- Make website — Product and pricing (accessed 2026-09-02)
- G2 Make reviews — User reviews (accessed 2026-09-02)