The best NVOCC software in 2026 ranks 1. CargoEZ 2. GoFreight 3. Magaya Supply Chain 4. CargoWise 5. Descartes Forwarder Enterprise Suite 6. Logitude World 7. Logistaas. CargoEZ leads as an all-in-one platform across forwarder, customs broker, importer, and NVOCC roles, with an AI-native direction CargoEZ says is rolling out through 2026 and a free demo rather than a free trial. GoFreight is the purpose-built NVOCC workflow specialist, Magaya wins when the NVOCC also runs a warehouse, and CargoWise is the answer once filing spans many countries.
TL;DR
- CargoEZ: Best all-in-one NVOCC software, one product across forwarder, customs broker, importer, and NVOCC roles, with an AI-native platform CargoEZ says is rolling out through 2026. Access is a free demo, not a free trial. Cites 4.8/5 on G2 across 40 reviews, a figure we could not confirm on a live read; custom pricing.
- GoFreight: Best purpose-built NVOCC workflow, with house and master bill handling and security filing core rather than configured, live in roughly 4 to 8 weeks. 4.8/5 on G2 across 88 reviews (vendor-cited); custom pricing.
- Magaya Supply Chain: Best for an NVOCC that also runs a bonded warehouse or CFS. Largest verified review base here, 4.4/5 on G2 across 281 reviews; from about $200/user/mo.
- CargoWise: Best for a global NVOCC filing across many customs jurisdictions. 4.3/5 on G2 across 30 reviews; custom pricing.
- Descartes Forwarder Enterprise Suite: Best when security filing and compliance are the primary risk. 57 G2 reviews (no verified score); custom pricing.
- Logitude World: Best for a very small NVOCC that wants a known price. 4.5/5 on Capterra across 40 reviews; $75 to $99/user/mo.
- Logistaas: Best published per-user price for a small forwarder that also issues house bills. 4.5/5 on Capterra across 33 reviews; from $45 to $85/user/mo.
If you run an NVOCC issuing your own house bills against a carrier's master bill, your software needs are not a pure forwarder's moving cargo under someone else's paper. I ranked seven NVOCC software platforms on the workflow that actually defines the job: house bill of lading handling, ISF security filing, arrival notices, and how fast you can be live.
What an NVOCC needs that a plain forwarder does not
An NVOCC (non-vessel operating common carrier) issues its own house bills of lading against a carrier’s master bill, which means the software has to keep house and master documents consistent, handle security filing, and produce arrival notices as core workflow rather than configured add-ons.
General import and export platforms configure around this; a smaller set of platforms, GoFreight and CargoEZ most directly, treat NVOCC bill handling as something the product was built to do.
Best Freight Forwarding Software for NVOCCs comparison: features, pricing and verdicts
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free trial | External rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Best all-in-one NVOCC software across forwarder, broker, importer, and NVOCC roles | Custom quote | Free demo | G2 4.8/5 (40 reviews) | |
Best purpose-built NVOCC workflow, live in 4 to 8 weeks | Custom quote | Free demo | G2 4.8/5 (88 reviews) | |
Best for an NVOCC that also runs its own warehouse | From approx. $200/user/mo | Free demo | G2 4.4/5 (281 reviews) | |
Best for a global NVOCC filing across many customs jurisdictions | Custom quote | Free demo | G2 4.3/5 (30 reviews) | |
Best when security filing and compliance are the primary NVOCC risk | Custom quote | Free demo | 57 reviews on G2, no verified score | |
Best for a very small NVOCC that wants a known price | $75/user/mo | Free trial available | Capterra 4.5/5 (40 reviews) | |
Best published per-user price for a small NVOCC issuing house bills | From $45/user/mo | Free demo | Capterra 4.5/5 (33 reviews) |
How we chose these tools
This ranking covers freight forwarding platforms judged specifically on NVOCC operations: issuing house bills against a carrier’s master bill, security filing, arrival notices, and the container tracking and forwarder accounting that sit around them. It reuses the verified data behind our broader best freight forwarding software comparison, re-scored for the NVOCC use case rather than general forwarding. G2 and Capterra ratings were read directly where possible; any figure we could not verify against an independent source is labelled vendor-cited or unverified rather than presented as confirmed. CargoEZ is the clearest case, a cited 4.8/5 across 40 G2 reviews that did not match its live G2 product page when we checked. Domestic truckload and LTL broker platforms are out of scope.
Read the full TopickZ.com testing methodology, the seven scoring criteria, weights, and the data we collect for every tool.
Detailed reviews
CargoEZ
Best all-in-one NVOCC software across forwarder, broker, importer, and NVOCC rolesWhat's great
- Built explicitly for four roles in one product, freight forwarders, customs brokers, importers, and NVOCCs, so an NVOCC that also brokers customs or acts as importer of record is not bending a forwarder-only platform to fit
- CargoEZ says it is building the platform AI-native, with AI-assisted automation and analytics it lists as coming through 2026, so an NVOCC betting on where the category is heading gets a vendor building toward that rather than treating AI as a later bolt-on
- Bundles native multi-currency invoicing and financial reporting, a logistics CRM, and rate management into the same product as house bill and ISF filing work, so an NVOCC runs quoting, operations, and accounting without stitching separate tools together
Watch-outs
- CargoEZ's own site currently frames its AI as coming soon, so treat the AI-native capability as a direction rolling out rather than a shipped, benchmarked feature, and ask for a live demo of whatever ships today on your own house and master bill data before it weighs on the decision
- The cited 4.8/5 across 40 G2 reviews did not match CargoEZ's own live G2 page when we checked, which showed no submitted reviews; verify the current number yourself
- Independent evidence and documented implementation timelines are thin next to GoFreight or Magaya, so an NVOCC with high bill volume should reference-check operations at its own size before committing
CargoEZ, from Avow Solutions, earns my top slot for an NVOCC for one structural reason: it is built for the NVOCC role specifically, alongside forwarder, customs broker, and importer, in a single product. If your NVOCC also acts as customs broker or importer of record, you are not configuring around a forwarder-only tool, and you get native multi-currency invoicing, a logistics CRM, rate management, and real-time cargo tracking in the same system as your house bill and ISF work. CargoEZ also says it is building the platform AI-native, with automation and analytics rolling out through 2026, so read that as direction rather than a shipped, benchmarked capability. Access is a scheduled demo, not a free trial, so book it and run your own house bill against a master bill before any sales conversation. The honest catch is evidence. CargoEZ is cited at 4.8/5 across 40 G2 reviews , and its own live G2 page showed no reviews submitted when I checked. That does not make the figure false, but I cannot stand behind it the way I can for GoFreight or Magaya, and the same caution applies to the AI until you have seen it live. I’d pick CargoEZ for a small-to-mid NVOCC that wants one all-in-one system and is comfortable verifying the rating and the AI roadmap itself.
Pricing breakdown
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Free demo | No cost | Running your own house bill and ISF workflow before a sales conversation |
| Core platform | Custom quote | NVOCCs, forwarders, and customs brokers consolidating into one system |
| NVOCC and multi-warehouse | Custom quote | NVOCCs issuing house bills at volume across more than one warehouse |
Security & compliance
| Standard | Availability |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Not listed |
| GDPR | Not listed |
| HIPAA | No |
| SSO / SAML | Not listed |
| Audit logs | Not listed |
CargoEZ compliance summary: SOC 2 Type II is not listed, GDPR is not listed, HIPAA is no, SSO/SAML is not listed, and audit logs is not listed.
Feature availability
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Free tier | ✗ demo only |
| Container tracking | ✓ |
| Forwarder accounting | ✓ multi-currency invoicing |
| House master bills | ✓ core |
| Ocean and air | ✓ both |
| Published pricing | ✗ |
| Security filing | ✓ |
| Warehouse management | ✓ native, multi-warehouse |
CargoEZ feature availability summary: Free tier (✗ demo only), Container tracking (✓), Forwarder accounting (✓ multi-currency invoicing), House master bills (✓ core), Ocean and air (✓ both), Published pricing (✗), Security filing (✓), and Warehouse management (✓ native, multi-warehouse).
Loading reviews…
GoFreight
Best purpose-built NVOCC workflow, live in 4 to 8 weeksWhat's great
- Built cloud-native for ocean and air import and export with NVOCC workflows included, so security filing, house and master bill handling, and arrival notices are core to the platform rather than configured from a generic template
- Implementation in roughly 4 to 8 weeks rather than the quarters CargoWise and Descartes require, which changes the decision for an NVOCC that cannot pull staff off daily operations for a rollout
- Bundles a customer portal with container tracking, so an NVOCC's clients check shipment status themselves instead of emailing the operations desk, the single biggest source of avoidable support volume
Watch-outs
- The 4.8/5 across 88 G2 reviews figure is vendor-cited from March 2026 and we could not independently verify it; confirm it on the live G2 page before it weighs on a decision
- Reviewers report the system slowing during peak periods, a meaningful complaint for an NVOCC whose busiest hours are exactly when documentation has to move
- Customs coverage is US-centric, so an NVOCC filing across European or Asian jurisdictions will find the depth well short of CargoWise or Descartes
GoFreight is the platform I’d point an NVOCC to when the workflow itself, not an AI roadmap, is the priority today. House bill of lading handling, security filing, and arrival notices are built for NVOCC operations specifically, and you can be live in roughly 4 to 8 weeks rather than running a multi-quarter program. Reviewers praise the interface and support; the recurring complaint is performance during peak periods, which I’d press on in a reference call with an NVOCC your size. On the rating, GoFreight cites 4.8/5 across 88 G2 reviews as of March 2026, and we could not confirm that from an independent read, so check it yourself. I’d choose it for a US NVOCC of roughly 5 to 100 users that wants a purpose-built workflow fast, and I’d look elsewhere for multi-country customs filing outside the US.
Pricing breakdown
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Core FMS | Custom quote, per user | Small to mid-sized NVOCCs replacing spreadsheets or legacy systems |
| With warehouse | Custom quote | NVOCCs adding CFS or warehouse operations to the same platform |
| Enterprise | Custom quote | Multi-branch NVOCCs needing API integration and custom reporting |
Security & compliance
| Standard | Availability |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Not listed |
| GDPR | Not listed |
| HIPAA | No |
| SSO / SAML | Not listed |
| Audit logs | Not listed |
GoFreight compliance summary: SOC 2 Type II is not listed, GDPR is not listed, HIPAA is no, SSO/SAML is not listed, and audit logs is not listed.
Feature availability
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Free tier | ✗ |
| Container tracking | ✓ |
| Forwarder accounting | ✓ |
| House master bills | ✓ core |
| Implementation time | ✓ 4-8 weeks |
| Ocean and air | ✓ both |
| Published pricing | ✗ |
| Security filing | ✓ |
| Warehouse management | ✓ |
GoFreight feature availability summary: Free tier (✗), Container tracking (✓), Forwarder accounting (✓), House master bills (✓ core), Implementation time (✓ 4-8 weeks), Ocean and air (✓ both), Published pricing (✗), Security filing (✓), and Warehouse management (✓).
What reviewers say about GoFreight
Recurring themes across GoFreight G2 reviews, 2024-2026. Rating and count are vendor-cited as of March 2026 and not confirmed by a live page read.
What reviewers praise
- The interface is consistently described as user-friendly, which reviewers contrast against the legacy systems they replaced.
- Implementation speed comes up repeatedly, with forwarders citing weeks rather than the quarters enterprise platforms require.
- The tracking system draws specific praise for keeping ocean and air shipment status current without manual chasing.
- Cloud access from anywhere is named as a practical benefit for forwarders with staff across offices and time zones.
- Support responsiveness and flexibility come up often, along with confidence that the platform will scale with the business.
What reviewers fault
- Performance slows during peak periods, which reviewers note is exactly when documentation volume is highest.
- Customs depth is US-centric, so forwarders filing entries in other jurisdictions find coverage thinner.
- The widely cited rating is vendor-sourced, so buyers should confirm current figures on the live G2 page themselves.
Loading reviews…
Magaya Supply Chain
Best for an NVOCC that also runs its own warehouseWhat's great
- 281 G2 reviews at 4.4/5 is by far the largest verified review base in this ranking, with 67% of reviewers rating it five stars, the strongest evidence signal available for an NVOCC evaluating a long-term system
- Warehouse management is native rather than an integration, which matters for the very common NVOCC-plus-CFS model; receiving, cargo release, and inventory live in the same system as the shipment file
- Forwarder accounting is built in, covering job costing, profit per file, and multi-currency AR and AP, so an NVOCC does not run financials in a parallel system that disagrees with operations
Watch-outs
- The interface reads as older than the cloud-native platforms; an NVOCC coming from GoFreight or a modern SaaS tool notices it, and it is a recurring theme in reviews
- Magaya does not publish a rate card, and third-party research placing entry near $200/user/mo is an estimate rather than a quote, so budgeting requires a sales conversation
- Strongest in the Americas; an NVOCC needing customs filing depth across many European or Asian jurisdictions gets more from CargoWise or Descartes
Magaya is where I’d point the NVOCC that also runs a bonded warehouse or CFS, which is a very common shape. You get house bills and arrival notices in the same system as receiving, cargo release, and inventory, with forwarder accounting native so profit per file does not wait on a month-end export. Its 281 G2 reviews at 4.4/5 is the largest verified base here by a wide margin, and 67% are five-star, which is the strongest evidence signal on this page. The interface is older than GoFreight’s and pricing is not published, with third-party research putting entry near $200/user/mo, so budget for a sales conversation. I’d run with it for a US or Latin American NVOCC between roughly 10 and 200 users, especially with warehouse operations, and I’d skip it if your customs filing spans a dozen jurisdictions.
Pricing breakdown
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Entry (est.) | From approx. $200/user/mo, per third-party research | Small to mid-sized NVOCCs consolidating ops and accounting |
| With warehouse (est.) | Custom quote | NVOCCs running a CFS or bonded warehouse alongside forwarding |
| Enterprise | Custom quote | Multi-branch NVOCCs needing API access and custom reporting |
Security & compliance
| Standard | Availability |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Not listed |
| GDPR | Yes |
| HIPAA | No |
| SSO / SAML | Yes |
| Audit logs | Yes |
Magaya Supply Chain compliance summary: SOC 2 Type II is not listed, GDPR is yes, HIPAA is no, SSO/SAML is yes, and audit logs is yes.
Feature availability
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Free tier | ✗ |
| Container tracking | ✓ |
| Forwarder accounting | ✓ native |
| House master bills | ✓ |
| Ocean and air | ✓ both |
| Published pricing | ✗ |
| Security filing | ✓ US focus |
| Warehouse management | ✓ native |
Magaya Supply Chain feature availability summary: Free tier (✗), Container tracking (✓), Forwarder accounting (✓ native), House master bills (✓), Ocean and air (✓ both), Published pricing (✗), Security filing (✓ US focus), and Warehouse management (✓ native).
What reviewers say about Magaya Supply Chain
Recurring themes across ~281 G2 reviews (4.4/5, 67% five-star) plus Capterra reviews, 2024-2026.
What reviewers praise
- Reliability is the theme reviewers return to most, described as software you can work in every day without fighting it.
- Document automation for air waybills and bills of lading removes format work that forwarders otherwise do by hand.
- The warehousing tool draws specific praise for giving forwarders visibility into warehouse volume alongside the shipment file.
- Real-time shipment updates and the report scheduler come up repeatedly as the features that replaced manual status chasing.
- Coverage across each area of logistics in one product means less duplicate data entry between systems.
What reviewers fault
- Database connectivity problems and freezes are the sharpest recurring complaint, with some reviewers reporting weekly disruption.
- Support response times are called out as lagging behind the platform's own efficiency.
- Integrations with some third-party finance and e-commerce systems still need manual steps or intermediate workarounds.
- The initial learning curve is real, though reviewers say the knowledge base shortens it considerably.
- Building custom templates is harder and more expensive than expected because it requires programming work.
Loading reviews…
CargoWise
Best for a global NVOCC filing across many customs jurisdictionsWhat's great
- Deepest customs and compliance coverage in the category, spanning dozens of national customs regimes in one platform, which is why the largest global NVOCCs and forwarders standardize on it
- Single database across forwarding, customs, warehouse, and accounting means a multi-country NVOCC sees one version of a shipment across every office instead of regional systems reconciling monthly
- Functional depth is genuinely unmatched; if a workflow exists in international forwarding or NVOCC operations, CargoWise has a configuration for it
Watch-outs
- Implementation is the hardest here, routinely measured in quarters, and demands internal expertise or a specialist consultancy; NVOCCs underestimate this cost more than any other line in the business case
- 30 G2 reviews at 4.3/5 is a thin community base for a platform of this position, and reviewers rate feature depth higher than ease of use or support
- Pricing is transaction and module based with no published rate card, and the total scales with shipment volume in a way that catches growing NVOCCs out at renewal
CargoWise is what I’d put a global NVOCC on once filing spans many countries, and the reasons have little to do with how it feels to use day to day. You get customs coverage across dozens of countries in a single database and one version of a shipment across every office. The G2 profile sits at 4.3/5 across 30 reviews, with depth rated highly and usability lower. Implementation runs into quarters and usually needs a specialist partner, so model it against where your shipment volume is heading, not where it is now. I’d choose it for an NVOCC above roughly 100 users operating across multiple customs jurisdictions, and I’d steer a 15-person NVOCC clearing US ocean imports away, since the implementation alone will outweigh the value.
Pricing breakdown
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Core forwarding | Custom quote, transaction and module based | Multi-country NVOCCs standardizing on one platform |
| Customs modules | Priced per customs jurisdiction | NVOCCs filing entries across several national regimes |
| Implementation | Separate engagement, often with a specialist partner | Budget planning; the licence is not the program cost |
Security & compliance
| Standard | Availability |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes |
| GDPR | Yes |
| HIPAA | No |
| SSO / SAML | Yes |
| Audit logs | Yes |
CargoWise compliance summary: SOC 2 Type II is yes, GDPR is yes, HIPAA is no, SSO/SAML is yes, and audit logs is yes.
Feature availability
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Free tier | ✗ |
| Container tracking | ✓ |
| Forwarder accounting | ✓ native |
| House master bills | ✓ |
| Ocean and air | ✓ both |
| Published pricing | ✗ |
| Security filing | ✓ many countries |
| Warehouse management | ✓ |
CargoWise feature availability summary: Free tier (✗), Container tracking (✓), Forwarder accounting (✓ native), House master bills (✓), Ocean and air (✓ both), Published pricing (✗), Security filing (✓ many countries), and Warehouse management (✓).
What reviewers say about CargoWise
Recurring themes across ~30 G2 reviews (4.3/5) plus Capterra reviews, 2024-2026.
What reviewers praise
- Module breadth is the dominant praise: forwarding, customs, warehousing, quoting, accounting, CRM, and EDI all interlinked on one data model.
- The rating engine gets named specifically as unusually powerful compared with anything else forwarders have used.
- Shipment visibility, filtering, and reporting are described as thorough, with documents generated by the system rather than typed.
- Reviewers say productivity gains are large once the configuration is right, and staff can cover for each other because everything lives in one place.
- The tutorial library and user certification program are cited as genuinely useful, with discounts offered to firms that certify staff.
What reviewers fault
- The learning curve is steep and reviewers say the feature depth itself creates the difficulty, especially for smaller offices.
- Support draws the most negative feedback in this comparison, including slow responses, tickets closed before resolution, and generic article referrals.
- Pricing is described as complicated, with many separate charges that reviewers say are hard to anticipate.
- Getting full value requires either learning the platform properly or hiring qualified help for setup and training.
Loading reviews…
Descartes Forwarder Enterprise Suite
Best when security filing and compliance are the primary NVOCC riskWhat's great
- Customs, security filing, and trade compliance are the Descartes core competency across a very large installed base, and the Forwarder Enterprise Suite inherits that rather than treating compliance as one module among many
- Sits inside the broader Descartes network, so an NVOCC can add carrier tracking, rate procurement, and global trade content under one vendor relationship instead of running four evaluations
- Descartes Systems Group carries 4.6/5 across 2,139 G2 reviews across its portfolio, a meaningful signal about delivery and support even though it is not a rating of this product alone
Watch-outs
- Only 57 G2 reviews for the Forwarder Enterprise Suite itself and no product-level star rating we could verify, so the evidence for this specific platform is thinner than the parent numbers suggest
- Module-based pricing with nothing published, and the platform that solves your problem is usually three or four modules rather than one, which makes early quotes misleading
- The breadth of the Descartes portfolio makes product boundaries confusing during evaluation; buyers regularly discover mid-cycle that a capability they assumed was included is a separate product
Descartes is the compliance company that also does forwarding software, and if your biggest NVOCC risk is a security filing missed or a customs entry filed wrong, that ordering matters. The Forwarder Enterprise Suite inherits the depth of a vendor whose whole business is trade compliance data. The G2 profile carries 57 reviews, thin, though the group overall sits at 4.6/5 across 2,139 portfolio reviews. I’d ask for a written module list with prices before committing, because the portfolio is broad enough that assumptions get expensive fast. I’d pick it when compliance exposure is your primary risk, and pass if you want one simple system with a published price.
Pricing breakdown
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Core suite | Custom quote, module based | NVOCCs needing ocean, air, and customs in one platform |
| Compliance modules | Priced per module and jurisdiction | Security filing, denied party screening, and customs entry |
| Network add-ons | Custom quote | Adding carrier tracking, rate procurement, or global trade content |
Security & compliance
| Standard | Availability |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes |
| GDPR | Yes |
| HIPAA | No |
| SSO / SAML | Yes |
| Audit logs | Yes |
Descartes Forwarder Enterprise Suite compliance summary: SOC 2 Type II is yes, GDPR is yes, HIPAA is no, SSO/SAML is yes, and audit logs is yes.
Feature availability
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Free tier | ✗ |
| Container tracking | ✓ via Descartes network |
| Forwarder accounting | ✓ |
| House master bills | ✓ |
| Ocean and air | ✓ both |
| Published pricing | ✗ |
| Security filing | ✓ category strength |
| Warehouse management | • via network |
Descartes Forwarder Enterprise Suite feature availability summary: Free tier (✗), Container tracking (✓ via Descartes network), Forwarder accounting (✓), House master bills (✓), Ocean and air (✓ both), Published pricing (✗), Security filing (✓ category strength), and Warehouse management (• via network).
What reviewers say about Descartes Forwarder Enterprise Suite
Recurring themes across ~57 G2 reviews of the Forwarder Enterprise Suite, 2024-2026. No product-level star rating is published separately from the Descartes portfolio score.
What reviewers praise
- Centralized control over shipments, finances, compliance, and customer data in one platform is the most repeated benefit.
- Real-time tracking across air, ocean, and road with exception alerts for delays, missed connections, and customs holds gets specific praise.
- Classification and customs entry support comes up often, with reviewers citing accurate prompts for applicable options.
- Reviewers describe setup as straightforward and the platform as easy to move around once familiar, which is unusual in this category.
- The single dashboard covering all active shipments is named as the view forwarders end up working from all day.
What reviewers fault
- The interface reads as old-fashioned, and reviewers say it is field-heavy with a lot of data entry and clicking.
- Workflow duplication comes up, with some reviewers entering the same information more than once.
- Occasional slowdowns and performance concerns appear in reviews.
- Some expected features are reported as unavailable, which pushes forwarders toward additional Descartes modules.
Loading reviews…
Logitude World
Best for a very small NVOCC that wants a known priceWhat's great
- Publishes its plans openly at $75/user/mo for SMART and $99/user/mo for PROFESSIONAL, so a small NVOCC can size the cost in an afternoon instead of a three-week quote cycle
- Deliberately simple interface that non-technical staff pick up quickly, which matters more than feature count at a small NVOCC where nobody has time for a training program
- Fast rollout with no implementation project, so the gap between signing and working in the system is days
Watch-outs
- The simplicity is also the ceiling; house and master bill depth, customs filing, and complex multi-leg or multi-currency scenarios are thin, and NVOCCs growing past roughly 25 users typically migrate
- 4.5/5 across 40 Capterra reviews is a good score on a small base skewed heavily toward very small businesses, so buyers above roughly 25 users have little directly comparable feedback
- Accounting depth is lighter than Magaya, so a growing NVOCC will likely still maintain a separate finance system
Logitude World is for the NVOCC that has outgrown the spreadsheet and does not want the platform decision to become a project. Its 4.5/5 across 40 Capterra reviews is a strong satisfaction score, and 97% of those reviewers are small businesses. You get published plans at $75/user/mo for SMART and $99/user/mo for PROFESSIONAL, deployed in days. The trade you make is depth: house and master bill handling, customs filing, and multi-currency are all thinner than GoFreight or Magaya. I’d run it at an NVOCC under roughly 25 users that wants simplicity and a known price, and I would not expect it to be the system you are still on in five years.
Pricing breakdown
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| SMART | $75/user/mo | Small NVOCCs replacing spreadsheets and email |
| PROFESSIONAL | $99/user/mo | Growing NVOCCs needing the fuller workflow and integrations |
| ENTERPRISE | Not published | Multi-office NVOCCs needing broader configuration |
Security & compliance
| Standard | Availability |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Not listed |
| GDPR | Yes |
| HIPAA | No |
| SSO / SAML | • limited |
| Audit logs | Yes |
Logitude World compliance summary: SOC 2 Type II is not listed, GDPR is yes, HIPAA is no, SSO/SAML is • limited, and audit logs is yes.
Feature availability
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Free tier | ✗ free trial |
| Container tracking | ✓ |
| Forwarder accounting | • basic |
| House master bills | • basic |
| Ocean and air | ✓ both |
| Published pricing | ✓ |
| Security filing | • limited |
| Warehouse management | • limited |
Logitude World feature availability summary: Free tier (✗ free trial), Container tracking (✓), Forwarder accounting (• basic), House master bills (• basic), Ocean and air (✓ both), Published pricing (✓), Security filing (• limited), and Warehouse management (• limited).
Loading reviews…
Logistaas
Best published per-user price for a small NVOCC issuing house billsWhat's great
- Publishes four per-user plans from $45/user/mo for CRM Only to $85/user/mo for full digital forwarding with accounting, which a small NVOCC can budget without a sales cycle
- The plan structure maps to real roles, so an NVOCC can put sales staff on the cheaper CRM plan and operations staff on the full plan instead of buying the top tier for everyone
- Cloud-native and quick to deploy, which suits an NVOCC of 5 to 40 users that cannot absorb a long implementation
Watch-outs
- 4.5/5 across 33 Capterra reviews is one of the thinnest evidence bases here, so a multi-year dependency carries more vendor risk than the price difference alone reflects
- House and master bill depth, customs filing, and complex routing fall well short of the enterprise platforms, so a growing NVOCC will eventually migrate
- Regional coverage is narrower than the global platforms, so verify jurisdiction support explicitly before signing
Logistaas does the thing almost nobody in this category does: it puts prices on a page. You get four per-user plans from $45/user/mo for CRM Only to $85/user/mo for full digital forwarding with accounting, with role-based tiers so your two salespeople do not cost what your operations staff do. For a small NVOCC that is a number you can model this afternoon. What you give up is depth and vendor scale; its 33 Capterra reviews at 4.5/5 is thin, and house-bill and customs depth are lighter than Magaya. I’d call it a reasonable trade at 8 users and a bad one at 80. Pick it for a small NVOCC of roughly 5 to 40 users that values cost clarity, and skip it if your customs exposure spans many jurisdictions.
Pricing breakdown
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| CRM Only | $45/user/mo | Sales staff who need quoting and customer records but not operations |
| Forwarding user | Between $45 and $85/user/mo depending on plan | Operations staff running shipments end to end |
| Digital Forwarder and Accounting | $85/user/mo | Full forwarding workflow with accounting for finance staff |
Security & compliance
| Standard | Availability |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Not listed |
| GDPR | Yes |
| HIPAA | No |
| SSO / SAML | • limited |
| Audit logs | Yes |
Logistaas compliance summary: SOC 2 Type II is not listed, GDPR is yes, HIPAA is no, SSO/SAML is • limited, and audit logs is yes.
Feature availability
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Free tier | ✗ |
| Container tracking | ✓ |
| Forwarder accounting | ✓ top plan |
| House master bills | • basic |
| Ocean and air | ✓ both |
| Published pricing | ✓ four per-user plans |
| Security filing | • limited |
| Warehouse management | • limited |
Logistaas feature availability summary: Free tier (✗), Container tracking (✓), Forwarder accounting (✓ top plan), House master bills (• basic), Ocean and air (✓ both), Published pricing (✓ four per-user plans), Security filing (• limited), and Warehouse management (• limited).
Loading reviews…
Tools we considered but excluded
We evaluated more tools than the 7 you see above. These did not make the cut. Saying what we rejected, and why, is the editorial muscle most listicles skip.
- Freightos: A strong rate-management and instant-quoting layer that ranks on our general forwarding list, but it does not produce house and master bills, file security declarations, or run NVOCC accounting, so it belongs alongside an NVOCC platform rather than on a ranking judged by NVOCC workflow
- project44 and FourKites: Real-time visibility platforms that track containers but do not issue house bills, file security declarations, or run forwarding operations
- Descartes Aljex, AscendTMS, and Alvys: Domestic truckload and LTL broker TMS platforms; they do not handle ocean or air documentation, house and master bills, or NVOCC accounting, and appear in our freight broker TMS comparison instead
Honorable mentions
Solid tools that did not crack the main list but are worth tracking, especially for niche use cases.
- Shipthis: A modern cloud FMS for forwarders and NVOCCs with instant quoting, documentation, and accounting; the closest alternative to GoFreight for a fast NVOCC implementation, though with less public review evidence behind it
- Fresa Gold: Established forwarding and NVOCC platform with real deployments in Asia and the Middle East, worth a demo for an NVOCC concentrated in those regions, though independent review presence is limited
What an NVOCC needs that a plain forwarder does not
An NVOCC issuing its own house bills against a carrier’s master bill is running a different job from a pure forwarder moving cargo under someone else’s paper. Your software has to keep both documents consistent, handle ISF security filing, and produce arrival notices constantly, not just at setup.
This is why NVOCC software is a category of its own: general import and export platforms configure around the workflow, while a smaller set was built for it.
That distinction is what I judged this ranking on. Not general forwarding breadth, but the specific loop you run dozens of times a week: house bill against master bill, ISF filing, arrival notice, done, without retyping the same data into three screens.
The 2026 NVOCC software shortlist
The field splits cleanly. CargoEZ and GoFreight are the two that treat NVOCC bill handling as core product rather than a configured module, and they lead for different reasons.
I put CargoEZ first for its all-in-one platform across four roles (forwarder, customs broker, importer, and NVOCC) with an AI-native direction it says is rolling out through 2026, and GoFreight right behind it for a proven, purpose-built workflow that goes live in weeks.
Magaya is my pick once a warehouse enters the picture, which is common for NVOCCs running a CFS. I’d only reach for CargoWise or Descartes when your filing spans many customs jurisdictions, since both come with implementation programs measured in quarters. Logitude World and Logistaas serve the very small NVOCC that wants a published price over depth.
Testing an NVOCC platform before you sign
Run an actual house bill against a master bill from a recent shipment and check that the data agrees across both without retyping. Then generate the arrival notice and the ISF filing on that same file.
This is the loop you run constantly at an NVOCC, and it is where thin house bill of lading software and bolt-on ISF filing software fall apart even when the sales demo looked clean.
If you are evaluating CargoEZ, book the demo (there is no free trial) and run that exact loop on your own data, then ask them to show the specific AI features live rather than accepting the coming soon marketing, since the AI is still rolling out.
For every other platform, I’d insist on a reference call with an NVOCC roughly your size and ask what broke in month three.
Which NVOCC platform fits your operation
- Small-to-mid NVOCC that wants one all-in-one system: CargoEZ. One product across NVOCC, forwarder, customs broker, and importer roles, with an AI-native platform it says is rolling out through 2026. Book the demo (no free trial), then verify the cited rating and the AI features yourself.
- NVOCC that wants a proven, purpose-built workflow fast: GoFreight. Roughly 4 to 8 weeks to live, with a customer portal for client self-service.
- NVOCC that also runs a bonded warehouse or CFS: Magaya Supply Chain. Native warehouse, forwarder accounting, and the largest verified review base here.
- Global NVOCC filing across many countries: CargoWise. Budget the implementation honestly and line up a specialist partner.
- NVOCC whose primary risk is compliance and security filing: Descartes Forwarder Enterprise Suite. Get a written module list with prices.
- Very small NVOCC that wants a known price: Logitude World at $75/user/mo, or Logistaas from $45/user/mo for role-based plans.
For the full category with pricing, ratings, and demo checklists across all platforms, see best freight forwarding software . For the harder head-to-head, see CargoWise vs GoFreight . For domestic truckload and LTL operations, see best TMS for freight brokers .
For corrections or vendor disputes on this ranking, email hello@topickz.com . Ratings and pricing are verified each time this page is updated; next scheduled refresh is October 2026.
Frequently asked questions
What is NVOCC software?
NVOCC software is the operating system for a non-vessel operating common carrier: it issues your house bills of lading against the carrier's master bill, handles ISF and security filing, and produces arrival notices, with container tracking and forwarder accounting wrapped around them. I think of it as NVOCC management software built for the paper you issue in your own name, not just cargo you move under someone else's.
What is the best freight forwarding software for an NVOCC?
I'd shortlist CargoEZ for its all-in-one NVOCC platform across four roles, with an AI-native direction it says is rolling out through 2026, GoFreight for a purpose-built NVOCC workflow live in 4 to 8 weeks, and Magaya if you also run a warehouse. CargoEZ's access is a scheduled demo, not a free trial, and I'd verify its cited rating yourself, since its live G2 page showed no reviews when we checked.
What makes NVOCC software different from a general forwarding platform?
An NVOCC issues its own house bills against a carrier's master bill, so your software has to keep house and master documents consistent, handle ISF security filing, and generate arrival notices as core workflow. GoFreight and CargoEZ treat this as built-in rather than configured, which is what I mean by real NVOCC software rather than a forwarding tool with NVOCC settings switched on.
How is NVOCC software different from a generic TMS?
A generic TMS is built to plan and execute transportation, usually domestic truckload or LTL, and it rarely issues house bills of lading, files ISF, or runs multi-currency forwarder accounting. Software for NVOCC operations starts from the opposite end: ocean and air documentation, house-against-master bill consistency, and customs and security filing come first, with tracking and accounting wrapped around that. If a vendor sells you a truckload TMS for NVOCC work, you will be bending the wrong tool.
What does NVOCC software cost?
It varies more than most categories. Published per-user pricing runs from about $45/user/mo (Logistaas) to $99/user/mo (Logitude World PROFESSIONAL), and Magaya's third-party research puts entry near $200/user/mo. The purpose-built and enterprise platforms, GoFreight, CargoWise, Descartes, and CargoEZ, quote custom rather than publishing a rate card, so budget for a demo and a written quote. My rule is to price the implementation separately, because on the enterprise platforms it can outweigh the first year of licences.
What is the fastest way to get an NVOCC live on new software?
I'd point to GoFreight, the fastest of the purpose-built platforms at roughly 4 to 8 weeks. Logitude World and Logistaas deploy faster still, but they carry thinner house and master bill handling, so I'd only put a very small NVOCC on them, not one issuing house bills at volume.
Does an NVOCC need multi-country customs coverage?
Only if you file across several jurisdictions. If you clear US ocean imports, GoFreight or Magaya will serve you; once you file across many countries you outgrow both and need CargoWise or Descartes.
Is CargoEZ proven for NVOCC operations?
It ships a genuine all-in-one platform for the NVOCC role, forwarder, customs broker, importer, and NVOCC in one product, which is real and useful today. Its AI, though, is a 'coming soon' direction rather than a proven capability, its independent evidence is thin, and its cited 4.8/5 G2 rating did not match its live G2 page when we checked. Book the demo (there is no free trial) and run your own house bill and ISF workflow on it before you commit.
Related helpful reads
Write a review
Posts to the page right away. Keep it real — no links or email addresses.