# Best TMS for Freight Brokers in 2026, Compared on Cost Seven freight broker TMS platforms compared on load entry speed, carrier compliance, load board integrations, settlement automation, and 2026 pricing. Comparing the best TMS for Freight Brokers of 2026 includes 1. Descartes Aljex 2. AscendTMS 3. Alvys 4. Tai TMS 5. Turvo 6. Revenova TMS 7. Rose Rocket. Seven TMS platforms built for the brokerage desk, from a new authority covering its first ten loads to a 60-desk 3PL running LTL and truckload side by side. Load entry speed, carrier compliance monitoring, load board integrations, margin visibility, settlement automation, and what each one actually costs when the setup fee is included. ## Quick summary - Descartes Aljex: Best overall broker TMS for established brokerages wanting a proven load-to-settlement system. 4.6/5 on G2 across 414 reviews, the largest verified base of any broker TMS; from $699/mo. - AscendTMS: Best free broker TMS for new authorities and small desks, no setup, support, or training fees and no contract. 4.9/5 on Capterra across 364 reviews; free up to 2 users, then from $49/user/mo. - Alvys: Best for cutting manual document entry, parsing rate confirmations and PODs into structured loads instead of retyping. 4.7/5 on G2 across 18 reviews; custom quote. - Tai TMS: Best for LTL-heavy brokerages, with direct LTL carrier rates and automatic invoicing on proof of delivery. 4.4/5 on Capterra across 73 reviews; from $995/mo. - Turvo: Best for 3PLs whose shippers will work inside a shared platform. 4.4/5 on G2 across 20 reviews; custom quote. - Revenova TMS: Best Salesforce-native option, so brokerage operations and CRM share one data model. 4.3/5 on G2 across 42 reviews; from $2,500/mo, which rules out smaller desks. - Rose Rocket: Best for brokerages that also run their own trucks and drivers. 4.8/5 on G2 across 15 reviews; from about $2,080/mo. ## How we chose This comparison covers TMS platforms built for freight brokers and 3PLs specifically, rather than shipper-side or asset-carrier systems. It draws on documented product capabilities, recurring themes across G2 and Capterra review samples, vendor pricing pages and published third-party pricing research verified in July 2026, and public product documentation. G2 and Capterra ratings and review counts were read on July 27, 2026. Where a vendor does not publish pricing, figures are labelled as estimates and attributed to third-party research rather than presented as list price. Real-time visibility platforms, freight forwarding software, and warehouse systems are out of scope; a broker TMS here means a system that quotes, covers, tenders, tracks, invoices, and settles a load. ## Tools compared ### Descartes Aljex: Best freight broker TMS for established brokerages that want a proven load-to-settlement system **Best overall** Score: 9.3/10 Rating: 4.6/5 (G2 · 414 reviews) **Starting price:** From $699/mo If you asked twenty brokerage owners what runs their desks, Aljex comes up more than anything else, and [414 G2 reviews](https://www.g2.com/products/descartes-aljex/reviews) at 4.6/5 backs that up. The load-to-settlement path is complete and it has been complete for years: quote, cover, run carrier compliance, tender, track, invoice the shipper, pay the carrier, see the margin. The [Aljex pricing page](https://www.aljex.com/pricing/) lists an Essential tier from around $699/mo, with third-party comparisons putting the Enterprise band near $2,375/mo as of March 2026, plus setup. Against Revenova at roughly $2,500/mo to start and Tai at $995/mo under its Growth plan, that is competitive at the low end and reasonable at the top. What you give up is polish. Aljex looks like software that has been running brokerages since before responsive design, because it has. Right for brokerages from about 3 to 50 desks that value reliability over aesthetics; wrong for hybrid operations where owned trucks are becoming the bigger half of the business. **Pros:** - 414 G2 reviews at 4.6/5 is roughly ten times the community evidence behind any other broker-native TMS in this comparison, and the score holds at that volume, which is the hardest thing to fake in software reviews - Publishes tiered pricing on its own site rather than hiding everything behind a demo request, so a five-desk brokerage can size the spend before booking a call and skip three weeks of quote chasing - Descartes ownership means MacroPoint carrier tracking, rate data, and carrier compliance tools are available inside the same vendor relationship, so a brokerage adds capability without adding contracts **Cons:** - The interface is dated and reviewers say so plainly; Aljex predates the design conventions that Alvys, Rose Rocket, and Turvo were built around, and new hires coming from a modern tool notice within an hour - The one-time setup fee is not published next to the tier pricing, so the real year-one cost sits meaningfully above the $699/mo headline for anything past a basic configuration - Built around brokerage workflow, which means the asset side is thin; a broker that buys its first five trucks will find driver settlement and equipment management weaker than a carrier-native platform Pricing breakdown: | Plan | Price | Best for | |---|---|---| | Essential | $699/mo plus one-time setup | Small brokerages moving off spreadsheets and email | | Mid tier (est.) | Approx. $1,000-$1,500/mo | Growing desks adding lane pricing and carrier compliance monitoring | | Enterprise (est.) | Approx. $2,375/mo, per third-party pricing research, March 2026 | Multi-office brokerages using the wider Descartes network | ### AscendTMS: Best free freight broker TMS for new authorities and small desks with no software budget **Best free tier** Score: 8.9/10 Rating: 4.9/5 (Capterra · 364 reviews) **Starting price:** Free Every other platform in this comparison assumes you already have revenue. AscendTMS does not, and that is the whole point. Free for two users, no setup, no support fee, no contract, no license. A new authority can book its first load today on real brokerage software instead of a spreadsheet, and if the business does not work out the exit costs nothing. That is a genuinely different risk profile from signing a $699/mo contract with a setup fee against revenue you have not earned yet. Paid tiers run roughly $49 to $149 per user per month, with sources disagreeing enough on the middle numbers that you should verify directly. Review volume lives on [Capterra](https://www.capterra.com/p/122488/AscendTMS-Logistics-Software/reviews/) rather than G2, where the satisfaction scores are strong. The ceiling is the honest caveat: past about 15 users, the thinner compliance and settlement tooling starts costing more in manual work than the license saves. Right for new brokerages and small desks; wrong as a platform you expect to still be on at 40 seats. **Pros:** - Free for up to 2 users with zero setup fee, zero support fee, and zero training fee, which is not a trial or a stripped demo but the actual product, and no other broker TMS in this comparison offers anything comparable - No contract and no license fee, so a brokerage that outgrows it or folds walks away without a termination negotiation; in a business where a third of new authorities do not survive year two, that matters more than a feature checkbox - Very large installed base for the price point, with AscendTMS citing over 51,000 active users, which means the core brokerage workflows have been hardened by a lot of operations rather than a handful of design partners **Cons:** - Third-party sources disagree on the paid tier prices, listing Basic at both $49 and $69 per user per month and Premium at both $99 and $119, so confirm the current numbers with AscendTMS before you build a budget on them - The free tier stops at 2 users and the paid model is per seat, so cost appears abruptly at the third desk rather than scaling smoothly with revenue - Carrier compliance monitoring, lane pricing analytics, and settlement automation are thinner than Aljex or Tai, and brokerages above roughly 15 users generally migrate rather than upgrade Pricing breakdown: | Plan | Price | Best for | |---|---|---| | Free | $0 for up to 2 users, no setup or support fees | New authorities booking their first loads | | Basic | $49/user/mo (some sources list $69) | Small brokerages past the free-tier user cap | | Premium | $99/user/mo (some sources list $119) | Growing 3PLs needing more automation and reporting | | Pro | $149/user/mo | Multi-desk brokerages wanting the complete feature set | ### Alvys: Best freight broker TMS for cutting manual document entry out of the back office **Best for document automation** Score: 8.8/10 Rating: 4.7/5 (G2 · 18 reviews) **Starting price:** Custom quote Alvys is built on a specific observation: the expensive part of running a brokerage back office is people retyping documents that arrived as PDFs. A rate confirmation lands, Alvys reads it, the load exists with the stops, the rate, and the reference numbers already populated. At 300 loads a week that is not a convenience, it is a headcount decision. [18 G2 reviews](https://www.g2.com/products/alvys/reviews) at 4.7/5 is a small sample but the themes are consistent: fewer steps to dispatch, fewer steps to invoice. The dual brokerage-and-asset model is the other reason to look, because the pure-broker and pure-carrier split that most TMS vendors enforce does not match how mid-market trucking companies actually operate. The complaint that sticks is pricing opacity. There is no number anywhere. Right for brokerages between roughly 10 and 200 loads a day where paperwork is the bottleneck; wrong for buyers who need a price before a call or want a decade of hardening behind the contract. **Pros:** - Document parsing turns rate confirmations, bills of lading, and proof-of-delivery paperwork into structured load records automatically, which attacks the single largest manual-labor line in a brokerage back office rather than a peripheral one - 4.7/5 across 18 G2 reviews, and G2's own alternatives data names Alvys the leading alternative to Rose Rocket, which tells you where buyers actually cross-shop when they want a modern system - Runs brokerage and asset operations in the same platform, so a brokerage that buys trucks or a carrier that brokers overflow freight does not end up reconciling two systems and two versions of the margin **Cons:** - 18 G2 reviews is a thin evidence base and Alvys is younger than Aljex by a wide margin, so a multi-year contract is a bet on roadmap execution rather than on a long production track record - No published pricing whatsoever, which is a real problem for the small and mid-sized brokerages Alvys markets to hardest, since evaluation cannot start without a sales conversation - Parsing accuracy tracks document quality, and brokerages receiving photographed or faxed paperwork from small carriers see more correction work than a clean demo implies Pricing breakdown: | Plan | Price | Best for | |---|---|---| | Starter (est.) | Custom quote | Small brokerages automating rate con and POD entry | | Growth (est.) | Custom quote | Hybrid broker and asset operations in one system | | Enterprise (est.) | Custom quote | Multi-office brokerages needing API access and custom workflow | ### Tai TMS: Best freight broker TMS for LTL-heavy brokerages that need direct carrier rates and automatic invoicing **Best for LTL brokerages** Score: 8.5/10 Rating: 4.4/5 (Capterra · 73 reviews) **Starting price:** From $995/mo LTL brokerage is a different business from truckload brokerage and most TMS platforms treat it as an afterthought. Tai does not. Direct carrier rate connections, quotes in seconds, and automatic invoicing once proof of delivery is confirmed. If your desk quotes 200 LTL shipments a day, the difference between pulling live rates and re-keying a rate sheet is the whole job. [73 Capterra reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/146697/Teknowlogi-TAI-TMS/reviews/) at 4.4/5 is a reasonable evidence base for a platform this specialized. Read the negative ones before signing, because the complaints that exist are about bugs and unannounced changes rather than missing features, and that is the kind of thing reference calls surface faster than a demo does. Pricing starts around $995/mo under Tai's Growth plan, a restructured tier that replaced the old flat per-ten-users entry point. Right for LTL-heavy brokerages and 3PLs with at least five or six desks; wrong for a two-person truckload brokerage, where the ten-user bundle is money spent on nothing. **Pros:** - Direct LTL carrier rate connections pull live rates and return a quote in seconds, which is the specific workflow that makes or breaks an LTL desk and is noticeably weaker in the truckload-first platforms in this comparison - Automatic invoice generation on confirmed proof of delivery closes the loop without a billing clerk touching each load, and Tai cites materially fewer billing disputes as a result of removing that manual step - Published entry pricing at $995/mo under the Growth plan puts a real number on the table before a sales call, which only Aljex and AscendTMS otherwise do in this category **Cons:** - 4.4/5 across 73 Capterra reviews is solid rather than exceptional, and the negative reviews are pointed; at least one IT manager reports frequent bugs and unannounced changes, which is a stability signal worth probing in reference calls - The ten-user entry bundle means a three-person brokerage pays for capacity it will not use for a year, making Tai worse value than AscendTMS or Aljex at the smallest end - Strongest on domestic FTL and LTL in the United States, so brokerages with meaningful cross-border, intermodal, or international freight will find coverage gaps Pricing breakdown: | Plan | Price | Best for | |---|---|---| | Growth | From $995/mo | LTL and FTL brokerages with an established desk count | | Growth (est.) | Custom quote above the ten-user bundle | Scaling brokerages adding automation and carrier connections | | Enterprise (est.) | Custom quote | Multi-office 3PLs with custom integration requirements | ### Turvo: Best freight broker TMS for 3PLs whose shippers will work inside a shared platform **Best for shipper collaboration** Score: 8.3/10 Rating: 4.4/5 (G2 · 20 reviews) **Starting price:** Custom quote Turvo bet that the expensive part of brokerage is not the system of record, it is the coordination around it. The load is a shared thread. The shipper sees status without calling, the carrier updates without an email chain, and your rep stops being a human API between two parties. [20 G2 reviews](https://www.g2.com/products/turvo/reviews) at 4.4/5 praise ease of use and real-time tracking, which is the right outcome if the model works. The catch is that it depends on people outside your company. Get your top 20 shippers engaged and exception management stops being inbox archaeology. Fail to, and you have bought an expensive internal chat tool with a load board attached. Pricing is the least transparent here, with public estimates spanning nearly an order of magnitude, so treat any number you read as noise and get the quote. Right for 3PLs with collaborative customer relationships and the account management to drive adoption; wrong for brokerages whose shippers do business by phone and intend to keep doing so. **Pros:** - Puts shipper, broker, and carrier in one shared thread attached to the load, which removes the email and phone-tag layer that consumes most of a 3PL's exception-handling hours - 4.4/5 on G2 with reviewers repeatedly citing ease of use and real-time tracking together, a combination that is rare in a category where configurability usually wins over usability - Carrier-facing mobile experience is good enough that carriers actually use it, which is the load-bearing assumption in any collaboration platform and the place most competitors quietly fail **Cons:** - Third-party pricing estimates span from roughly $599/mo to roughly $5,000/mo depending on source and configuration, which is the widest published range in this comparison and makes budgeting from public information impossible - 20 G2 reviews is a thin base for a platform positioned at larger 3PLs, so buyers signing significant annual contracts have less independent evidence than the spend justifies - The network features only pay off if your customers participate; a brokerage whose shippers refuse to log into another portal is paying a premium for collaboration it will never see Pricing breakdown: | Plan | Price | Best for | |---|---|---| | Standard (est.) | Third-party sources cite from approx. $599/mo | Smaller 3PLs testing the collaborative model | | Platform (est.) | Third-party sources cite up to approx. $5,000/mo | Full freight planning | | Enterprise | Custom quote | Large broker networks with custom integration needs | ### Revenova TMS: Best freight broker TMS for brokerages already running Salesforce as their CRM **Best Salesforce-native** Score: 8.0/10 Rating: 4.3/5 (G2 · 42 reviews) **Starting price:** From $2,500/mo Revenova only makes sense in one situation, and in that situation it makes a lot of sense. Your brokerage already runs Salesforce, your reps live in it, and you are tired of syncing a TMS against a CRM that disagrees with it. Revenova puts the load inside Salesforce, so the customer, the opportunity, the shipment, and the invoice are one record chain. [42 G2 reviews](https://www.g2.com/products/revenova-tms/reviews) at 4.3/5 back the customization story: brokerages with a Salesforce admin reshape it to fit their workflow instead of negotiating with a vendor roadmap. The price is the gate. Around $2,500/mo per company on an annual subscription, on top of Salesforce licensing, plus modules. Reviewers name cost and complexity as the top complaints, and support responsiveness after that. Right for brokerages above about ten desks that are already committed to Salesforce; wrong for anyone who would be adopting Salesforce in order to adopt Revenova. **Pros:** - Built natively on Salesforce, so the customer record, the opportunity, the load, and the invoice share one data model; a brokerage already on Salesforce stops maintaining an integration between sales and operations entirely - Inherits the Salesforce platform's customization, reporting, and permissions model, which means a brokerage with a Salesforce admin can reshape workflows without waiting on a TMS vendor roadmap - 42 G2 reviews at 4.3/5 with buyers consistently citing customization depth and workflow automation, which is what you would expect from a platform whose foundation is the most configurable CRM in the market **Cons:** - Roughly $2,500/mo per company as an entry point on an annual subscription, before Salesforce licensing itself, which puts Revenova well out of reach for brokerages under about ten desks - The Salesforce dependency cuts both ways; reviewers flag cost and complexity as the two most common complaints, and every add-on module compounds both - Support responsiveness comes up as a recurring criticism in G2 reviews, which is a harder problem in a two-vendor stack where the answer to a broken workflow can live on either side of the line Pricing breakdown: | Plan | Price | Best for | |---|---|---| | Entry | From $2,500/mo per company, annual subscription | Established brokerages already licensed on Salesforce | | Modules | Priced by application module and user count, volume discounts apply | Adding carrier settlement | | Enterprise | Custom quote | Multi-entity 3PLs building custom workflow on the Salesforce platform | ### Rose Rocket: Best TMS for brokerages that also run their own trucks and drivers **Best for hybrid broker-carriers** Score: 7.9/10 Rating: 4.8/5 (G2 · 15 reviews) **Starting price:** From approx. $2,080/mo Rose Rocket earns its place on this list for one specific shape of business: the brokerage that bought trucks. [15 G2 reviews](https://www.g2.com/products/rose-rocket/reviews) at 4.8/5 is the top satisfaction score here, and the praise is about speed. Order entry, dispatch board, adding carriers by MC number, invoicing. All fast, all in a modern interface that new dispatchers pick up without a training week. The unlimited-user model on the Full Service Platform is the right shape for a hybrid operation, because a company running both sides has more people touching the system than a pure brokerage does. Third-party research puts the Full Service Platform near $2,080/mo with a 90-day go-live target, and implementation costs on top of that. That is a real commitment, not a trial. Right for hybrid broker-carriers and asset-based operations that also broker; wrong for a pure brokerage with no trucks, where Aljex or Tai fit the daily work better for less money. **Pros:** - Highest satisfaction score in this comparison at 4.8/5, with reviewers describing a modern interface that hides real depth rather than a stripped-down one that hides nothing - Unlimited-user pricing on the Full Service Platform removes the seat math, which matters in a hybrid operation where dispatchers, billing clerks, and customer service all need access and none of them should be a licensing debate - Adding a carrier by MC or DOT number pulls the record instead of requiring manual entry, and the QuickBooks and MacroPoint integrations cover the two systems most brokerages bolt on separately **Cons:** - 15 G2 reviews is the smallest sample in this comparison; the 4.8 score is excellent but rests on a narrow base, and Aljex's 4.6 across 414 reviews is the more statistically meaningful number - Rose Rocket is Canadian and reviewers note that date and currency formatting defaults do not always follow US conventions, a small but daily irritation for US-only desks - Carrier-first design means pure brokerage features like lane pricing analytics and margin management are less developed than in Aljex or Tai, so a brokerage with no trucks is buying strength it will not use Pricing breakdown: | Plan | Price | Best for | |---|---|---| | Per-user (est.) | Approx. $50/user/mo at 10 users, falling to approx. $35 at 100 | Smaller hybrid operations with a fixed headcount | | Full Service Platform (est.) | From approx. $2,080/mo, unlimited users | Broker-carriers wanting orders | | Enterprise | Custom quote plus implementation | Multi-terminal operations with complex settlement requirements | ## More ## How broker TMS platforms differ from every other kind of freight software A brokerage does not own the trucks and does not own the freight. It owns the relationship on both sides and the spread in between, and a TMS built for anyone else gets this wrong in ways that cost real money. **Carrier sourcing and compliance is the core loop.** A shipper-side TMS assumes you have contracted carriers. A brokerage assumes nothing. The system has to post to load boards, take inbound carrier calls, verify authority and insurance and safety rating before the load is tendered, and keep that compliance record current. Aljex, Tai, and Alvys treat this as the primary workflow. Shipper platforms treat it as an afterthought. **Margin is a first-class number.** Brokerage software has to show the buy rate, the sell rate, and the spread on every load, in real time, to the person who can still do something about it. Carrier TMS platforms track cost per mile. Shipper platforms track spend. Neither one shows you a rep quietly booking at a 4% margin all week. **Settlement runs in both directions.** The brokerage invoices the shipper and pays the carrier, often on different terms, sometimes with quick-pay factoring in the middle. Getting this wrong is how brokerages develop cash flow problems that have nothing to do with their sales performance. **Load board integration is not optional.** DAT and Truckstop are where capacity gets found. A broker TMS that cannot post and search from inside the system forces a rep to work in three browser tabs, and that is where the copy-paste errors live. ## The 2026 broker TMS landscape **Document automation is the one place AI has genuinely delivered.** Alvys parses rate confirmations into loads. Tai generates invoices automatically once proof of delivery is confirmed. Both are attacking the same problem from opposite ends of the load lifecycle, and both are producing measurable savings rather than demo-stage promises. The AI pitch in freight software that deserves skepticism is the one about optimizing routes. Operations research solved that decades ago and it does not need a language model. **Pricing transparency improved, slightly.** Three of the seven platforms here publish an entry price, which is better than the broader freight software market where two out of nine do. That is still a category where most buyers cannot compare costs without a three-week sales cycle. If you are evaluating more than one platform, start every quote conversation on the same day, because the last quote to arrive is the one that gets undercut. **Consolidation is quietly reshaping the middle of the market.** Descartes has assembled Aljex, MacroPoint, and a broad logistics data portfolio under one roof. Trimble absorbed Kuebix and several other TMS products. For buyers the practical effect is that adding capability increasingly means expanding an existing vendor relationship rather than running a new evaluation, which is convenient right up until you want negotiating room at renewal. **The free tier is doing more work than it used to.** AscendTMS running a real free product for two users has changed the entry economics of starting a brokerage. New authorities no longer choose between a spreadsheet and a $699/mo commitment. That has pushed the paid entry points of everything else to justify themselves harder. ## What to test in every broker TMS demo **One, cover a load end to end and time it.** Post to a load board, take a carrier call, run the compliance check on authority, insurance, and safety rating, tender the load, and produce the rate confirmation. At 200 loads a week, a two-minute difference in this loop is about seven hours of desk time weekly. Sales engineers will do this if you ask. **Two, enter a load from an ugly rate con.** Bring a real one from a small carrier, ideally a photographed PDF. Ask them to create the load from it without cleaning it up first. This is where document automation claims either hold or collapse. **Three, check what a carrier failure looks like.** A carrier misses a pickup appointment. Who gets alerted, how fast, and does the shipper-facing update fire automatically or wait for a person to remember? Exception handling is what customers actually judge a brokerage on. **Four, run a full settlement with an accessorial.** Delivered load, detention charge, lumper fee. Invoice the shipper, pay the carrier, reconcile the margin, export to QuickBooks. Count the screens. This workflow runs hundreds of times a month and small friction compounds into a full-time billing role. **Five, pull a margin report by rep by lane for last quarter.** How long does it take to generate, and can a non-technical manager build it without a support ticket? If margin analysis requires the vendor's help, it will not happen weekly, and margin problems found quarterly are margin problems found late. **Six, get the year-one total in writing.** Subscription, setup fee, data migration, training, integration work, and per-user overage. The monthly price is the part vendors volunteer. Everything else arrives later. ## Picking the right TMS for your brokerage ### 1. Desk count decides most of the shortlist Under 3 desks: AscendTMS free or Basic. From 3 to 15 desks: Descartes Aljex, or Tai if your freight is LTL-heavy. From 15 to 50 desks: Aljex, Alvys, or Turvo depending on whether your bottleneck is paperwork, coordination, or neither. Above 50 desks: Aljex Enterprise, Revenova if you are already on Salesforce, or a direct conversation with McLeod. ### 2. Whether you own trucks changes the answer entirely A pure brokerage should not buy a carrier-first platform, and a hybrid operation should not run two systems. If owned equipment is more than about 20% of your volume, shortlist Alvys and Rose Rocket. If you have no trucks and no plans to buy any, the carrier-side depth is money spent on features you will never open. ### 3. LTL versus truckload is a real fork LTL brokerage lives on rate accuracy and quote speed across many carriers. Tai is built for that specifically. Truckload brokerage lives on capacity sourcing and margin management, which is where Aljex and Alvys are stronger. Brokerages running both should test the LTL quoting workflow hardest, because that is where general-purpose platforms most often disappoint. ### 4. Existing systems constrain more than buyers expect Already on Salesforce with a real admin? Revenova removes an integration you are currently maintaining. Running QuickBooks? Confirm the sync is native and bidirectional rather than a nightly CSV. Already paying for MacroPoint tracking? Aljex and Rose Rocket both connect to it without a middleware project. ## The right broker TMS by brokerage profile - **New authority, first loads, no revenue yet:** AscendTMS free tier. Two users, no setup fee, no contract, no risk. - **Small brokerage, 3 to 10 desks, truckload:** Descartes Aljex at $699/mo. 414 G2 reviews at 4.6/5 and a published price. - **LTL-heavy brokerage with five or more desks:** Tai TMS from $995/mo. Direct carrier rates and automatic invoicing on proof of delivery. - **Brokerage where the back office is the bottleneck:** Alvys. The document parsing is the reason, and it is the biggest recoverable cost most brokerages have. - **3PL with collaborative shipper relationships:** Turvo. Get the quote in writing, because public price estimates span nearly an order of magnitude. - **Brokerage already committed to Salesforce, 10-plus desks:** Revenova TMS from about $2,500/mo. One data model instead of a permanent integration project. - **Brokerage that has bought its own trucks:** Rose Rocket or Alvys, both running brokerage and asset operations without reconciling two systems. - **Large brokerage above 75 desks:** Aljex Enterprise, with a parallel conversation with McLeod on the enterprise side. For the wider category including shipper-side platforms and real-time visibility, see the [best freight management software](/list/best-freight-management-software/) comparison. Brokerages moving international ocean and air freight should look at the [best freight forwarding software](/list/best-freight-forwarding-software/) comparison, where customs and documentation workflows are the deciding factor. If you have bought trucks and now need telematics and ELD compliance alongside your TMS, the [best fleet management software](/list/best-fleet-management-software/) comparison covers that stack. For corrections, vendor disputes, or feedback on this comparison, email [hello@topickz.com](mailto:hello@topickz.com). Pricing, G2, and Capterra data are verified each time this page is updated; next scheduled refresh is October 2026. ## FAQs ### What is the best TMS for a new freight brokerage? AscendTMS, free for 2 users with no setup fee and no contract. Move to Descartes Aljex from $699/mo once you pass three or four desks. ### How much does a freight broker TMS cost in 2026? AscendTMS: free to $149/user/mo. Aljex: from $699/mo plus setup. Tai TMS: from $995/mo under its Growth plan. Rose Rocket: from about $2,080/mo. Revenova: from about $2,500/mo. ### Which freight broker TMS platforms publish their pricing? AscendTMS, Descartes Aljex, and Tai TMS publish entry pricing. Alvys, Turvo, and Rose Rocket require a sales conversation. Revenova publishes an entry figure but prices modules on quote. ### Is there a free TMS for freight brokers? AscendTMS is free for up to 2 users with no setup, support, or training fees. It is the only genuinely free broker TMS in this comparison. ### What is the best TMS for an LTL brokerage? Tai TMS. Direct LTL carrier rate connections return quotes in seconds and invoices generate automatically on confirmed proof of delivery. ### Do broker TMS platforms integrate with DAT and Truckstop? Yes, the major ones do. Aljex, AscendTMS, and Tai all connect to the main load boards. Confirm which posting and search features your specific tier includes. ### Which broker TMS has the most reviews? Descartes Aljex, with 414 G2 reviews at 4.6/5. That is roughly ten times the review base of any other broker-native TMS here. ### Should a brokerage that owns trucks use a broker TMS or a carrier TMS? Use a platform that does both. Alvys and Rose Rocket run brokerage and asset operations in one system, which avoids reconciling two sets of numbers. ### How long does a broker TMS implementation take? AscendTMS: same day. Aljex and Tai: 2 to 6 weeks. Alvys: 2 to 8 weeks depending on integrations. Rose Rocket Full Service: 90-day go-live target. ### What should I negotiate before signing a broker TMS contract? The setup fee, the contract length, the exit terms, and what happens to your data on termination. Setup fees in particular are frequently discountable and almost never volunteered.